Breaking Ranks

Dignity is not negotiable.

  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Books
    • All Rise
    • Belonging: A Memoir
    • Dignity for All: How to Create a World without Rankism
    • Genomes, Menomes, Wenomes: Neuroscience and Human Dignity
    • Mathematics of Classical and Quantum Physics (Dover Books on Physics)
    • Questions & Quests
    • Religion and Science: A Beautiful Friendship?
    • The Rowan Tree
    • The Theory of Everybody
    • The Wisdom of Science: Science in Sound Bites
    • Theo the White Squirrel
  • Press Coverage
  • TV and Radio
  • Art and Music
  • Contact Us

Ending Academic Apartheid: Equity and Dignity for Adjunct Professors

In choosing the academic life, most teachers expect to be part of a community committed to freedom, fairness, and justice. It’s the rare academic who does not take pride in belonging to an honorable profession.

I was a young college president during the turmoil of the sixties and early seventies. Within a few years, students, faculty, and administrators at virtually all our institutions of higher learning were serving on committees charged with aligning institutional policy with emergent values of racial diversity and gender equality.

By century’s end, most colleges and universities had taken steps to disallow discrimination based on race, gender, age, disability, and sexual orientation.

adjunctOnce again, we find ourselves in a moral predicament. In educational institutions of every kind, adjunct faculty are being subjected to de facto discrimination and exploitation. They know it, tenure-track faculty know it, administrators know it. The awful secret is out, and we can no longer avert our eyes. We’ll have to deal with this injustice as we did with those that came to a head in the sixties, because if we do not close the gap between our principles and our practice, the profession will forfeit its honor.

I need not belabor the immorality of paying adjuncts a fraction of what other faculty earn, and of denying them benefits, office space, parking rights, and a voice in departmental and institutional policy. These insults and humiliations are reminiscent of the degradation and injustice that roused academics to act against racial, gender, and other indignities.

Of course, there’s a reason that things are as they are. There is always a reason, one which seems cogent enough until suddenly it does not. What began as part-time teaching to meet a temporary need or plug a gap in the curriculum has evolved into systemic institutional injustice.

No one takes exception to cost-cutting, but forcing one group to subsidize another that’s doing comparable work, while maintaining working conditions that signal second-class status, is what the world now rejects as Apartheid.

That Academia has fallen into a practice that warrants the ignoble label “apartheid” is inconsistent with both academic and American values. By working for a pittance, adjunct faculty are serving as involuntary benefactors of other faculty, administrators, and students. That administrators and tenured faculty are themselves the beneficiaries of such victimization only strengthens the case for righting this wrong.

Honor requires that colleges and universities examine this practice and take steps to grant equal status and equitable compensation to those who, for whatever reason, are classified as adjunct faculty.

How might this be done? Coming up with a plan to end exploitation is never easy, and no doubt will require that we do what we did forty years ago: charge college and university committees—that include representatives of all stakeholders—with devising equitable solutions. Everything must be on the table, even the sensitive issue of tenure.

As anyone acquainted with adjunct professors knows, they are, on  average, as conscientious and committed, and as capable of carrying out research and of inspiring students, as the tenure-track faculty they subsidize.

Let me suggest a goal to guide the deliberations of what I hope we will soon see on every campus: a “Committee on the Status and Compensation of Adjunct Faculty.” That goal is: Part-Time, Full Status, Equal Dignity.

If colleges and universities tackle this threat with the same commitment and determination they brought to the issues of civil and women’s rights, they will find a way to end the exploitation of those now relegated to the back of the bus.

Latest Release

Latest Release

Connect with Robert W Fuller:

Follow by Email
Facebook
Twitter
Follow Me
YouTube

Dignity Tour

  • Rankism: A Social Disorder
  • Dignity: A Universal Human Right
  • Modeling a Dignitarian Society
  • 20 Ways to Combat Rankism
  • Robert W. Fuller’s Articles
  • What the Future Holds

Robert W. Fuller

Robert W. Fuller named the problem of rankism in Somebodies and Nobodies and described how societies can promote universal dignity in All Rise. With Pamela A. Gerloff he co-wrote Dignity for All - a handbook for the Dignity Movement. His most recent books are Religion and Science: A Beautiful Friendship?, Genomes, Menomes, Wenomes: Neuroscience and Human Dignity, Belonging: A Memoir, The Rowan Tree: A Novel, The Wisdom of Science, and The Theory of Everybody.

Robert W. Fuller @ Wikipedia

Dignity Movement Resources

  • ACLU Action Alerts
  • AlterNet.org
  • Change.org
  • Charter for Compassion
  • Dignity @ Facebook
  • Good Men Project
  • Human Rights
  • Media Matters
  • Moms Rising
  • MoveOn.org
  • Now Action Alerts
  • Restorative Justice
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 · Generate Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkRead more