Rankism: A Social Disorder
An undiagnosed disorder is at large in the world. It afflicts individuals, groups, and nations. It distorts our personal relationships, erodes our will to learn, taxes our economic productivity, stokes ethnic hatred, and incites nations to war. It is the cause of dysfunctionality, and sometimes even violence, in families, schools, and the workplace.
Over the course of history, the most common abuses of power have acquired special names:
|
|
Each of these practices is an abuse of the weak by the strong. Each of these familiar named offenses is an instance of bullying, of pulling rank. By analogy with abuses based on race and gender, abuse based on rank is given the name rankism.
1. n. abuse, discrimination, or exploitation based on rank
2. n. abusive, discriminatory, or exploitative behavior towards people who have less power because of their lower rank in a particular hierarchy
Once you have a name for it, you see rankism at the heart of many infringements of human rights, far away or close to home. Rankism is the root cause of indignity, injustice, and unfairness. Choosing the term rankism, places the goal of universal human dignity in the context of contemporary movements for civil rights. Reexamining racism, sexism, and ageism as examples of rankism breathes new life into the movements opposing them. Identifying rankism in all its guises and overcoming it is democracy’s next step.
Isn’t Pulling Rank Human Nature?
Sure it is. But history shows us, through changing attitudes toward racism and sexism, that opposing rank-based discrimination is not hopeless. If anything is human nature, it is the will to democracy, that is, the will to curtail abuses of rank by acting together to create systems of governance that circumscribe authority.
The first step is to become aware of rank as an excuse for abuse. As we become adept at distinguishing between the legitimate and illegitimate uses of rank, collective opposition to rank’s abuses becomes possible.
Rankism’s Toll
On Personal Relationships
In personal relations, the abuse of rank is experienced subjectively as an insult to dignity. Our antennae are tuned to detect the slightest trace of condescension or indignity in others’ treatment of us. Pulling rank takes the form of disrespect, insults, disdain, ‘dissing’, berating, snobbism, and humiliation. It is meant to demean, to exploit, to wound, to harm, and to damage - and it does. Even when not deliberately malicious, rank abuse can still warp and deform our interactions.
On Productivity
While on a visit to Philadelphia, George Washington noticed that free men there could do in “two or three days what would employ [his slaves] a month or more.” His explanation that slaves had no chance “to establish a good name [and so were] too regardless of a bad one” was that of a practical man concerned with the bottom line, not that of a moralizer, and therefore all the more telling.
Today, employers are not dealing with slaves, though it is sometimes argued that wage-earners are wage-slaves and salaried employees are only marginally more independent. Negative motivation - fear of demotion or job loss - is now dwarfed by the positive motivation that comes from being part of a team of responsible professionals. Eliminating recognition deficiencies in the work place is proving as good for the bottom line as eliminating nutritional deficiencies was for the productivity of day laborers.
On Learning
The real and imagined threat of rank abuse pervades all our educational institutions from kindergarten through graduate school. Finding and holding one’s position in a hierarchy takes priority over all else. In any institution with gradations of rank, protecting one’s dignity from insult and injury siphons attention and energy away from learning.
No child - no human being - is expendable. Everyone has something to contribute, and when that contribution is made and acknowledged, he or she feels like a somebody. Helping individuals locate that something and contribute it is the proper business of education.
On Leadership
In any institution, rank-based discrimination limits the access of potential high performers to better jobs by inhibiting movement among ranks. It also puts those holding high rank under the kind of stress that gradually undercuts the creativity that brought them success in the first place.
Repeating themselves gradually separates somebodies from their creative source, depleting them until they become empty shells. With enough repetitions, they begin to wonder why they ever thought they had anything to offer. Burnout is the occupational hazard of somebodyness.
On Spirit
Our passions are unique and personal. They grow out of our questions, out of the contradictions we feel with other people, with others’ work, or with society. Initially we wonder Who’s right? What’s beautiful? What’s fair? What’s true? We’re not sure. Our questions generate our individuality. Through our response to them, we define ourselves, we become someone in particular. Rank, social and otherwise, still keeps many from cultivating their questions into life-altering quests.
Read personal stories about the trickle-down consequences of rankism here.
Just a quick response to say that I just discovered this site a few minutes ago and am glad that I did. I’m teaching a graduate course on leadership and managing change this summer and have already begun to think of ways that I might be able to integrate this topic (more fully than I already do) into the course.
Thanks.
Tom
Comment by Tom Hinchcliffe — May 6, 2006 @ 11:12 am
Please don’t hesitate to ask any questions! This site is still in development, and I have a lot of plans to empower people to cope with rankism. I’m working on a database to archive problems right now. Did you see our syllabi links?
Comment by Elisa — May 7, 2006 @ 5:20 pm
I am teaching this concept in my Critical Perspectives course. I find it to be a really important concept for teachers to be aware of.
Thank you.
Comment by Shonda — July 13, 2006 @ 12:50 pm
Hi, Shonda - where do you teach this course? We have a course syllabus page, and we’d be happy to add your information if it isn’t there already.
Comment by Elisa — July 14, 2006 @ 6:50 pm
I have had a problem with something that I have seen get worse over a period of about 20 years. In the auto plant there is a Union. This is a strength of protection came about on the shoulders and even deaths of ‘auto workers united’ during a certain period in labor history. During this period however women were being abused to the 90th power in these auto plants by so other so called members (males)”brotherhood”. Today it is even worse (to the 100th power). This “brotherhood” (after indulging in some of the most, confrontational, retaliatory, harassing, harmful (death by design) of female co-workers, they have the nerve to say “as brothers and sisters we have to stick together on the strikeline ?? This galls me to no end. What is worse there are women turning upon other women, like maggots on prime cuts. It is an infestation of self destruction. In plain unadulterated English it is my conclusion supported by my long time observation that the un-united auto worker is destroying its own work place and the security of a place to work. All of this in the long run (very soon) will have contributed to the nearing destruction of this very country !! I am very, very, very upset by this. Don’t think for a moment that I have not tried to initiate a cessation of this ‘organized’ chaos. For my efforts I was silenced . Surely you can imagine what this entailed.
Comment by P. Tall — July 17, 2006 @ 12:57 pm
Having been on all sides at one time or another during my 38 years of work history and being female, I have absolutely seen it all. There is one thing for certain - daily, there will always be one person (at least) in management or co-workers who will make your life uncomfortable or miserable. Mr. Fuller is “right on”! Rankism exists, always has and it’s time to educate all workers/management, male and/or female.
The next thing for certain is that trying to stay alive and well in a non-union workplace definitely can be hard on your health. If you have no one to stand up for and assist you, trust me, I’ll take the union work every time. No one is perfect but it’s better being in numbers than alone.
Comment by G. Ford — October 13, 2006 @ 6:40 pm
I don’t want to put my last name on here because it is very unusual and easily recognizable. Not that I am going to say anything I wouldn’t want repeated. I, too , am female and have worked for years in construction and in a shipyard. there is definitely rankism among the male union members. Not all of them but enough to make earning a living a tough struggle. Such a tough struggle that I am looking for something else to do. It’s bad enough that union construction workers get abused by contractors and our own officers; it’s doubly bad when I can see that I am discounted and ignored even though I have talent to contribute. Discounted and ignored by the very “brothers” that feel betrayed and abused by the union officials they elected and the contractors we work for.
Good luck with this site. I am looking forward to reading more of it as I have only read two pages so far. Hang in there, P. Tall. You are not alone. Nor you G. Ford.
They(the perpetrators of rankism) try to keep us women apart so we cannot work together for change.
Comment by Laura Jean L. — October 22, 2006 @ 4:58 pm
RANKISM: just the info i needed as i continue to struggle with a non-profit corporation to fufill it’s contract with my low income housing complex in california. with murders, stabbings, vandalism, burglaries, domestic violence, arson, you name it - i’ve been trying to address it with management for years now. being poor, past middle age, disabled and a woman, i often feel powerless and want to throw my hands in the air and say F it! but i will never stop advocating for social order and promises kept. i must remember i am a person, not a problem.
Comment by anita henri — November 11, 2006 @ 9:51 am
It seems the moment we go looking for the help we need in our lives, all manner of topics cross can our paths anymore. Synchronicity is really getting noisier and noisier to recognize!
The word “Rankism” looks like many things to me at a distance, since, I have not looked much deeper at the intention or context of this idea, or of a ‘Dignity Movement.’ I have just encountered “Rankism,” and “The Dignity Movement” as subjects due to an email list I am on… Impressionistically, I believe I can grasp the basic concepts here, as being another facet in the larger discussion on conscious human evolution.
Is there room inside this topic for the complicated relationships inside families who have the legacy of unhealed abuses? Specifically where a female predecessor has been a childhood victim of sexual trauma, and remaining unconscious to the memories, has passed a lifetime of unspoken, unrecognized and consequently unmet needs for deep healing down to her children, creating a pattern of targeting behaviors that are pointed negatively at her own daughter, as well as manipulative behaviors for protection that have utilized sons as “husbands of convenience?” These patterns are terrifically polarizing in a family of origin over the course of a life, and have debilitating emotional and psychological consequences that most people commonly seem to ignore as ever existing. It seems that only the targeted are left with the brunt end of consequences that are harder to ignore, or avoid.
Comment by Kerrie B. Wrye — April 26, 2007 @ 12:18 pm
[…] This is an interesting website, about the idea of rankism. More basic than racism or homophobia, rankism is seeing yourself as above another person, and acting accordingly. […]
Pingback by Hello, My Name Is Kate » Rankism — May 4, 2007 @ 7:41 pm
the rankism can limit the productivity, habilities or desires of people, inclusive the productivity of a nation
Comment by roberto — January 26, 2008 @ 2:18 pm