<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1251"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Breaking Ranks &#187; activism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog/archives/category/activism/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog</link>
	<description>This blog seeks to raise public awareness of rankism.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dignity &#8211; A Unifying Value for American Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog/archives/210</link>
		<comments>http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog/archives/210#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 23:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert W. Fuller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nobody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankism and the state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world without rankism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog/archives/210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both political parties know that a unifying core value expressed in a pithy slogan translates into votes. FDR&#8217;s Democrats had &#8220;The New Deal&#8221;; LBJ&#8217;s party advanced &#8220;The Great Society.&#8221; Republicans rally to &#8220;lower taxes,&#8221; &#8220;smaller government,&#8221; &#8220;strong defense,&#8221; and &#8220;family values.&#8221;
What core value, what slogan, could move us beyond the toxic standoff that paralyzes American [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog/archives/210/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Dignitarian Manifesto</title>
		<link>http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog/archives/204</link>
		<comments>http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog/archives/204#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 21:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert W. Fuller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankism and the state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankism at work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankism in health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world without rankism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog/archives/204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is a follow up to a conversation initiated by Doc Searls.
When it comes to politics, new language and new thinking are different things. Whatever new language progressives used in 2004 failed to change the electoral outcome, and at most it&#8217;ll help them eke out a few victories in the coming years. New language [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog/archives/204/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dignity &#8211; A Core Unifying Value for American Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog/archives/187</link>
		<comments>http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog/archives/187#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 22:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert W. Fuller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankism and the state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world without rankism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog/archives/187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats acknowledge the need to clarify their core values. Crashing the Gate by Jerome Armstrong and Markos Moulistas Zuniga calls for a conceptual breakthrough, but the grassroots/netroots process it describes falls short of providing the unifying idea that Democrats seek.
What basic, compelling idea can do for Democrats today what &#8220;The New Deal&#8221; did for FDR; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breakingranks.net/weblog/archives/187/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
